The flash we've been anticipating will be available starting in December!
We are expecting shipments of SMDV BRiHT-360 TTL Bare Bulb Flash starting at the beginning of December. We are taking orders now.
BRiHT-360 Flash is a TTL and HSS capable bare bulb flash with integrated battery.
BRiHT is:
Bare bulb
Remote controllable
integrated battery
HSS capable, and
TTL capable
360 watt class flash.
TTL and HSS capability requires use of SMDV FlashWave-5 transmitter. Initially, the TTL/HSS capable FlashWave-5 will be limited to Canon and Nikon cameras. However, support for other camera manufacturers is in the plan.
We will post updated specifications as soon as possible.
Saturday, November 12, 2016
Monday, April 4, 2016
SMDV BRiHT-360 Bare Bulb TTL Flash specification published!
SMDV BRiHT-360 Flash is ...
Bare bulb
Remote controlled
integrated battery
HSS, and
TTL capable, and
360 watts of power!
Expected availability: May 27 Autumn By the end of 2016
Saturday, February 20, 2016
FAQs ... Why SMDV Speedbox for speedlights? Considering Speedbox-S65
One of the more frequent questions we get from our potential customers has to do with how it compares with other similar looking softboxes with speedlights. Obviously, we have not tried every softbox out in the market. But I thought it would be interesting to compare one of the better known and well regarded softbox with SMDV's Speedbox: Westcott Rapid Box 26" and SMDV Speedbox-S65.
Here's a summary of our findings*;
* This comparison is focused on the light quality. Obviously, Speedbox is much faster to deploy and take down than Rapid Box. For instance, I can open up Speedbox-S65 in about 12 sec.
What was surprising is how much more light loss there was with the Rapid Box. We knew that the SMDV Speedbox is more efficient. But the amount of the difference was a bit surprising.
Here are the details on the set up and equipment used.
Here were the light meter readings:
f/10: Bare flash, Canon 430EX II
f/9: Speedbox-S65
f/6.3: Rapid Box
So, the difference between bare flash and Speedbox is only 1/3rd stop. Between bare flash and Rapid Box was 1.33 stop, i.e., the Rapid Box lost 1 more stop of light than the Speedbox. (We repeated the test using Metz 64 AF-1 to be sure and the differences in the light output were the same, i.e., 1/3 stop and 1-1/3 stop.)
Below are some sample shots of a scene to show the difference.
Here, the differences are readily visible.
Here is one other observation. A lot of beginner photographers comment to us how SMDV Speedbox is expensive. SMDV Speedbox is not cheap. But we are convinced that it is a higher quality product. Light is softer and more even. Also, you get more out of your flash.
For instance, some folks spend more to get bigger flash, but are not willing to spend more on softboxes to make the best of their more expensive flash. I feel that is being penny wise and pound foolish. For instance, if one gets Metz 64 to get more light (than Canon 430), you would get about 2/3 stop more light (see the chart below). But if you put Rapid Box (or some other cheap imitation of SMDV Speedbox), you would lose 1 stop of light. The person would've gotten more light (and better quality light) and saved more money by getting Canon 430 and using SMDV Speedbox.
Here is what I mean. First, take a look at some relevant flash measurements.
So, here are couple of options typically considered by beginner photographers.
We understand that the difference between flashes models is easier to tell. But by failing to understand the differences in softbox quality, one who selects option #1 (or something similar) can end up paying substantially more for not only less light, but lesser quality light (option 1 is $263 more, but 2/3 stop less light).
Finally, in some forums, some folks tried to dismiss us by saying that we are biased. It is true that we are biased because we are an authorized SMDV dealer. But, our findings are what it is. If anyone doubts it, we would invite you to test it and see for yourself. Finally, unlike many retailers, we actually use and believe in the quality of our products.
Hope you find this helpful.
Jay
Here's a summary of our findings*;
* This comparison is focused on the light quality. Obviously, Speedbox is much faster to deploy and take down than Rapid Box. For instance, I can open up Speedbox-S65 in about 12 sec.
What was surprising is how much more light loss there was with the Rapid Box. We knew that the SMDV Speedbox is more efficient. But the amount of the difference was a bit surprising.
Here are the details on the set up and equipment used.
- Softboxes: SMDV Speedbox-S65 and Westcott Rapid Box 26"
- Flashes: Canon Speedlite 430EX II (and Metz 64 AF-1 for a comparison test)
- Flash zoom setting: 24mm
- Flash power setting: full power
- We put a light stand at about 8 ft from a wall to place the softboxes.
- Another light stand was placed against the wall to make sure the light meter was at the same place every time.
- Room was dark ... very little ambient light.
- The flash zoom setting was set at 24mm because anything narrower is not going to be able to evenly fill the softbox.
Here were the light meter readings:
f/10: Bare flash, Canon 430EX II
f/9: Speedbox-S65
f/6.3: Rapid Box
So, the difference between bare flash and Speedbox is only 1/3rd stop. Between bare flash and Rapid Box was 1.33 stop, i.e., the Rapid Box lost 1 more stop of light than the Speedbox. (We repeated the test using Metz 64 AF-1 to be sure and the differences in the light output were the same, i.e., 1/3 stop and 1-1/3 stop.)
Below are some sample shots of a scene to show the difference.
Here, the differences are readily visible.
Here is one other observation. A lot of beginner photographers comment to us how SMDV Speedbox is expensive. SMDV Speedbox is not cheap. But we are convinced that it is a higher quality product. Light is softer and more even. Also, you get more out of your flash.
For instance, some folks spend more to get bigger flash, but are not willing to spend more on softboxes to make the best of their more expensive flash. I feel that is being penny wise and pound foolish. For instance, if one gets Metz 64 to get more light (than Canon 430), you would get about 2/3 stop more light (see the chart below). But if you put Rapid Box (or some other cheap imitation of SMDV Speedbox), you would lose 1 stop of light. The person would've gotten more light (and better quality light) and saved more money by getting Canon 430 and using SMDV Speedbox.
Here is what I mean. First, take a look at some relevant flash measurements.
So, here are couple of options typically considered by beginner photographers.
We understand that the difference between flashes models is easier to tell. But by failing to understand the differences in softbox quality, one who selects option #1 (or something similar) can end up paying substantially more for not only less light, but lesser quality light (option 1 is $263 more, but 2/3 stop less light).
Finally, in some forums, some folks tried to dismiss us by saying that we are biased. It is true that we are biased because we are an authorized SMDV dealer. But, our findings are what it is. If anyone doubts it, we would invite you to test it and see for yourself. Finally, unlike many retailers, we actually use and believe in the quality of our products.
Hope you find this helpful.
Jay
Friday, January 22, 2016
Another KPS T5 User Impression
We wanted to share with you one of our recent customer's impression of the KPS T5 Geared Ball Head.
Here's what Mr. Don Libby wrote about the KPS T5.
We couldn't agree more. We also use the KPS T5 on a regular basis ... .
Please click here to visit Iron Creek Photography Blog and read the rest.
Here's what Mr. Don Libby wrote about the KPS T5.
I had thought that I would have to wait a couple of days to really put the T5 to a test however I found myself using it the day after I wrote the above. I ended up shooting an interior and used the T5 with my Phase One XF. Without any thought of what I was doing I set the camera up much as I would have when I still used the Cube. Very simple and without any real effort. It wasn't until an hour or so later that it dawned on me what I had done and just how easy it was.The sign of a great piece of gear is the ability to use it with little to no concern and get the shoot. Which I did.You can guess the rest. I ended up asking for an invoice which I promptly paid. The T5 is now mine. Yes, it's that good!
We couldn't agree more. We also use the KPS T5 on a regular basis ... .
Please click here to visit Iron Creek Photography Blog and read the rest.
Monday, January 4, 2016
Update on KPS T5 Geared Ball Head availability
Good news for those who've been most patient!
We are expecting a limited batch of the updated KPS T5 Geared Ball Head by the last week of January.
The new version has an updated main lock knob. The updated version features a click-stop knob that helps the user to know how much force is needed for optimal operation of the microTilt function. Read more about it here (go to the bottom of the blog for "Update").
We are expecting a limited batch of the updated KPS T5 Geared Ball Head by the last week of January.
The new version has an updated main lock knob. The updated version features a click-stop knob that helps the user to know how much force is needed for optimal operation of the microTilt function. Read more about it here (go to the bottom of the blog for "Update").
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)